Sunday, December 11, 2005

We're Not So Special

Negara Malaysia mempunyai rakyat berbilang bangsa dan agama tetapi hidup dalam keadaan yang aman dan harmoni. (Malaysia consists of people of different creeds and religions and yet we live together peacefully.)
That's standard SPM (the Malaysian GCSE equivalent) essay material for you. Thankfully, racial or religious tensions have not escalated to the extent of the Sunni-Shiite problem in Iraq nor the Islamophobia in the West.

However, contrary to the impression I got when I was still in school, we are certainly not the only multi-cultural hub in the world. Sure, we're a melting pot of cultures but so is France, the UK, Sri Lanka, Kenya -the statement above applies to Malaysia as equally as it would to many countries across the globe.

Salman Rushdie writes in reference to the multi-faceted society within the UK but I think that what he says can be applied to Malaysia as well.

When we, as individuals, pick and mix cultural elements for ourselves, we do not do so indiscriminately, but according to our natures. Societies, too, must retain the ability to discriminate, to reject as well as to accept, to value some things above others, and to insist on the acceptance of those values by all their members. This is the question of our time: how does a fractured community of multiple cultures decide what values it must share in order to cohere, and how can it insist on those values even when they clash with some citizens’ traditions and beliefs?

The beginnings of an answer may be found by asking the question the other way around: what does a society owe to its citizens? The French riots demonstrate a stark truth. If people do not feel included in the national idea, their alienation will turn to rage. Chouhan and others are right to insist that issues of social justice, racism and deprivation need urgently to be addressed. If we are to build a plural society on the foundation of what unites us, we must face up to what divides. But the questions of core freedoms and primary loyalties can’t be ducked. No society, no matter how tolerant, can expect to thrive if its citizens don’t prize what their citizenship means — if, when asked what they stand for as Frenchmen, as Indians, as Britons, they cannot give clear replies.

Undeniably, as a Malaysian Chinese, I identify myself more with Malaysian culture than with Chinese culture. By this I mean that when I compare myself with my friends from China or Hong Kong, I can draw stark differences between us and in relation to my Malaysian friends (again, regardless or race or religion) there is a sense of familiarity and common ground. However, if you were to ask me what my Malaysian citizenship means, I honestly can't give you a straight answer. Surely being Malaysian goes beyond our mamak culture, our obsession with multiple As in national exams and the priviledge of cheap DVDs?

8 comments:

Roy said...

True. Patriotism or nationalism is just blind love, affection and allegiance to an idea that the piece of land that granted you your passport (which was carved by your colonial masters and which is ruled by heartless overweight men) is superior to your neighbours'.

In this age and day, our borders don't serve us any good use (other than to "protect" us from all the "gejala buruk" and "pendatang haram" - whatever that means, hah).

Roy said...

Gandhi, Mandela, Che and Aung San Suu Kyi - call them whatever you want. But it is quite clear that their struggles were not directly for 'motherland'. They were all fighting against injustices committed by different parties, sometimes colonial powers, sometimes from their own 'countrymen'.

I still stand by my assertion that it is all just blind affection towards an identity and idea created by a system which has the power and resources to concentrate and focus its people's love and affection. Who else can do that but the State?

Call me a cynic. But just observing how 'culture' and 'identity' are being redefined daily by our policymakers only goes to show how we are part of an experiment(s). Just read books about what kind of cultural policies before the 90s our policymakers had in mind.

Having said that, I don't believe why our allegiance to the State and our national aspirations should exceed that of my participation and membership in other social structures, e.g. (the usually quoted) language, religion, race. Or the mundane - school, neighbourhood, city, football club, political affiliation. Today it is our country. Who knows that in a couple of years we'd drop that and adopt the EU-esque ASEAN identity? Or God forbid, we lose our association with the Federation and identify with our individual states?

A counter-example to the idea that identity is defined nationally - Our feelings towards Singaporeans. I bet most of us can identify more with them than we can with Malaysians from another far flung corner.

And precisely because it is not a simple matter, the State (or whatever Power) should let identity be defined organically, and not impose artificial constraints (such as national boundaries [Old EU and New EU], denial of racial identity [France] etc.)

My point is that it is difficult to identify this common unified identity that is uniquely Malaysian. In fact, I don't think there is anything at all, apart from us having the same passports or Warganegara on our ICs. And wait, any attempt to define "Malaysian-ness" on the web would overly represent the perceptions and aspirations of the middle-class, urban, educated and young.

Ultimately, I am not saying that national identity or nationalism or patriotism is all bad. It's just irrational and mindless. Just like how we feel nostalgic and dreamy and hopeful about other things.

Having not understood a single fig of what I have just said:
- patriotism and nationalism is an alien concept - affection to a disconnected idea not shared by all
- national identity is not and should not be superior to that to other social hierarchies
- we can attempt to identy 'things Malaysian', but it is an exercise with no end and no point
- identity is all irrational - it's 'nostalgia'

stefkhaw said...

I see where you're coming from Roy and I must admit that I agree with what you say to a certain extent. You definitely see past everything that the Petronas ads try to embody, probably because you're seen the Dewan Rakyat ones. I agree with the first three points of your second post but I not on the fourth because we all need to find our identity somewhere, not necessarily in a national context but maybe from the other social hierarchies yo've mentioned.

What I gather from what you're writing is that you deem Gandhi, Mandela etc as not fighting for the independence of their respective countries but for their respective ideologies and political beliefs.

Perhaps it is right to say they fight for a certain dream and idealistic identity which they have for the future of their country. But surely their fights are not blind since (1)if they were blind they would have no clear idea of where they were going, which is obviously a contradiction to the previous sentence. And (2)if they were blind they would probably have gotten nowhere and this is proved wrong by Gandhi and Mandela who have gotten somewhere. I admit to not knowing much about Che but I still have hope for Myanmar's democratic plight.

By saying that 'patriotism or nationalism is just blind love....', you are undermining and discrediting everything that these people are fighting for.

Roy said...

Ok. Agree to disagree.

Anyway, as much as I am no sympathizer of this man, look at what Dr. Mahathir said in 1997 (Malaysia in the next millennium: Challenge for the Next Generation)
said:

"Wars between nations will not be possible. In fact in a borderless world there will be no nation and no national loyalties to be involved in and to fight for. But there would be a lot of violence due to minor misunderstanding over issues, interpretations, esoteric ideologies and new group loyalties not based on race or nations. Such violence will be endemic and extremely impossible to put an end to".
(http://www.malaysiakini.com/opinionsfeatures/44614)

Hope I'm not taking this out of context, but I think this is a safe extrapolation: Even a so-called patriot/nationalist (I believe that he is one) foresees that loyalties and identity would be at different levels, other than that based on race/nation.

Undermining the struggles of patriots? Someone once said, history is written by the winners.

Anonymous said...

Enjoyed a lot! » » »

Anonymous said...

Excellent, love it! » »

Anonymous said...

Excellent, love it! Using mobile phone to test microwaves infiniti replacement auto parts Apple laptop adapter troubleshoot mazda 626 pics Bathtub chip repair Cheap phone calls to saudi Flight from dublin to london stain remover hair dye linen http://www.pontiac-monsoon-stereo-speakers.info/Provigil-in-egypt.html Factory chrysler parts responses to wedding invitations Wife's reaction + impotence luau island tropical wedding invitations

sex stories of dog and man said...

He mounted me and told me to put his cock in mywet pussy. Flud blinked and passed a glance with his brother.
mother son masturbation stories
nifty.org nifty stories dad low hanging
male mutual masturbation stories
erotic x rater adult sex stories
free internet rape stories
He mounted me and told me to put his cock in mywet pussy. Flud blinked and passed a glance with his brother.

291206

291206